In Senegal gay people go to jail.

Posted: January 9th, 2009 | Author: | Filed under: Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Trans | No Comments »

whoa.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7817100.stm


The Church of Gay (good points!)

Posted: January 6th, 2009 | Author: | Filed under: Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Trans | No Comments »

Funny, and a commentary on how my taxpayer dollars are going to churches who are trying to turn our country into a theocracy!

The Founding of the Church of Gay

Posted by AndyS in Colorado, Daily Kos at 5:00 PM on December 25, 2008.

Your taxpayer dollars will be used to fund our work overturning all laws contrary to our religious precepts.

This will be a church and a religion with the following precepts (and ONLY the following precepts):

1. "Sexual orientation is OK" — to the Church of Gay, being gay (or straight, or bi, or just not interested, for that matter) is ok, and any disagreement with the above precept is sacrilege and heresy.

2. The individual choice of marriage between any two consenting non-related adults is Holy. Those partaking of the Act are, by definition, Holy in the eyes of the Church of Gay.

3. Discrimination or treating societally differently any person on the grounds of sexual orientation in any manner is an abomination.

4. The existence or non-existence of a creator is beyond the bounds of Church of Gay philosophy.

First, we can demand immediate tax exempt status for all activities of the Church of Gay as any other Church.

And, any funds disbursed for public referenda on gay rights would be tax exempt to the extent that such similar activities of the Mormon, Catholic, or any other Churches, would also be tax exempt for the Church of Gay.

That’s right — your taxpayer funds will be used to fund our activities in overturning all laws contrary to our religious precepts. That’s the way it is, and too bad for you. We will of course abide by non-endorsement-of-candidate IRS guidelines. The fact that in many cases this doesn’t matter very much if we still bad-mouth candidates who believe in things contrary to our position is, again, too bad for you.

Secondarily, the State forbidding or interfering in any manner with the marriage of any two consenting non-related adults, along with all the legal rights attendent therefrom is heresy and an abomination to our church.

The state therefore would be restricting our freedom of religion to prohibit any civil marriage covered under Church of Gay religious law. Our First Amendment right to freedom of religion, you see, trumps every other right.

And, yes, any disagreement with our religious precepts is religious bigotry.

We demand in addition, chaplains for our religious philosophy furnished and paid for by the military for all military personnel here in the United States or overseas.

Happy Festivus, all you heathens!


Trangendered toilet signs; Reactions

Posted: October 1st, 2008 | Author: | Filed under: Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Trans | No Comments »

Second year student Jane McConnell is fucking retarded. I’m pretty sure toilet signs aren’t mentioned in the bible. I don’t understand at all what ethnicity has to do with it. And the last dude clearly wasn’t informed of the transgendered-people-being-murdered-in-bathrooms thing mentioned by the police officer.

Transgender students force lavatory change
A row has broken out at the University of Manchester after its student union lavatories were stripped of their genders so as not to offend transgendered people.

The ladies’ lavatory is now simply labelled "toilet" while the mens’ has become "toilets with urinals."

The student union decided to change the signs during a meeting of its executive in the summer following a number of complaints from transgender students.

Women’s officer Jennie Killip refused to say how many people had complained, and there are no figures for how many transgender people there are among the university’s 35,000 population.

She said: "If you were born female, still presently quite feminine, but defined as a man you should be able to go into the men’s toilets.

"You don’t necessarily have to have had gender reassignment surgery, but you could just define yourself as a man, feel very masculine in yourself, feel that in fact being a woman is not who you are.

"Transgender people can face violence and abuse when they go into toilets and we wanted to provide a place where they can feel comfortable.

"I have had complaints from people who said we didn’t have any facilities for them."

But the switch has caused consternation among many of the students returning from their summer break.

Second-year student Jane McConnell, 19, a news editor on the Student Direct student newspaper, said: "While these signs might be appropriate for people with different sexualities, I also think that many people from different religious and ethnic groups are going to feel uncomfortable using these facilities.

"Even though they’re just two signs, at the end of the day, toilets should be for women and for men specifically, not for both."

Another student said: "This is ridiculous. It is just too much political correctness." 460_toilet_1001290c.jpg


DMC tries to defeat Cali Marriage Amendment, FRC..

Posted: August 15th, 2008 | Author: | Filed under: Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Trans | No Comments »

Read this first one. Basically conservatives would like the DMC to go center because they know that that will fuck them up. Hopefully they will realize that going more left will inspire people who have given up on them. Thanks for the opposite analysis, Family Research Council!

[also, the picture. Yes, the predominantly straight married DMC is trying to defeat marriage!]

Conventional Wisdom Lacking at DNC

The Democratic National Committee (DNC) is putting its money where its mouth is. According to public records, the party, which last weekend unveiled the most radical platform ever seen at a national convention, gave $25,000 to defeat California’s marriage protection amendment. As its nominee drifts even farther to the left, the DNC has been quick to follow with serious concessions in the platform, including the first-ever mention of repealing the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).

With this $25,000 gift, Democrats are making an unprecedented statement that marriage is no longer a valued institution within the party. Although DNC Chair Howard Dean is an outspoken proponent of same-sex "marriage," he should know that a surprising percentage of the grassroots is not. At last count, 30 percent of California Democrats supported Proposition 8’s definition of marriage as the union of a man and woman. Supporting counterfeit marriage is not a winning strategy. In a poll we commissioned, an overwhelming majority of Americans (58%) "would be more likely to vote for a presidential candidate who supports [marriage] amendments."

To win, the DNC should stop trying to keep up with Obama and instead try to keep up with the Joneses–normal American families who, regardless of party, still place the utmost importance on man-woman marriage. Now that we know the DNC’s priority is abolishing thousands of years of traditional marriage, I can’t help but wonder where the RNC stands. Will we see a $25,000 check in defense of marriage?

And, of all the things you could be writing about China and their human rights abuses…

Facing the Music in Beijing

A last minute change to the Opening Ceremonies is casting dark clouds on a three-hour masterpiece that most of the world considered a historic moment in the Olympic Games. During a particularly stirring part of the performance, nine-year-old Lin Miaoke was believed to have sung the Chinese anthem for the 91,000 present. However, it’s since been revealed that the picture-perfect Miaoke was only lip synching for a talented little girl named Yang Peiyi who was not deemed pretty enough to appear on the national stage. Unbeknownst to the world, Miaoke was faking Peiyi’s talented rendition, a controversy that has led to a firestorm of criticism across the globe. Citing Peiyi’s supposed "buck teeth," musical director Chen Quigang said, "The reason was for national interest. The child on camera should be flawless in image, internal feelings, and expression."

This is just another symptom of a society that does not recognize the intrinsic value and contribution of each human life. History shows that the eugenic quest for human perfection and harsh population control efforts (such as China’s one-child policy) both contribute to high rates of (often forced) abortion. For example, in China little children with clubbed feet have traditionally been aborted. On the other hand, both girls should be congratulated simply for surviving, given the cultural preference for boys which often leads to sex-selection abortions. Time and time again the Chinese have attempted to put their best face forward. Perhaps if China didn’t have so much to hide from the world, they wouldn’t need to worry so much about the facade they’re trying to create. marriage.jpg


The Politics of Transexual Erotica

Posted: July 28th, 2008 | Author: | Filed under: Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Trans | No Comments »

interesting to all people who are interested in venturing beyond the gender binary…

What Trans Erotica Gets Wrong

By Andrea Zanin, Sex Geek. Posted July 24, 2008.

There’s a vast difference between eroticizing trans people and exoticizing them in ways that scream "I’m clueless and disrespectful."
Tools
email EMAIL
print PRINT
COMMENT NOW

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

Also in Sex and Relationships

Bush Administration Tries to Lure States into Supporting Abstinence-Only Sex-Ed
Scott Swenson

Racist Myths About African Sexuality Persist in AIDS Prevention Efforts
Gbemisola Olujobi

"Return of Desire": Fighting Myths About Female Sexuality
Sue Katz

Could Cheating Save a Relationship?
Greta Christina

Progressives to Confront Bad Sex-Ed Policies at ‘Netroots Nation’
Marcela Howell
More stories by Andrea Zanin

RSS icon Sex and Relationships RSS Feed

RSS icon Main AlterNet RSS Feed
Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

Advertisement

I just finished reading M. Christian’s anthology, Transgender Erotica: Trans Figures . And I’m sad to say I didn’t like it much.

This is definitely an example of how my politics are inextricably linked to my libido. I just can’t get turned on by stuff that’s politically questionable. There’s a vast difference between eroticizing the forbidden and exoticizing people for their gender (or any other feature) in ways that scream "I’m clueless and disrespectful."

Unlike Best Transgender Erotica, edited by Raven Kaldera and Hanne Blank, Trans Figures seems to have been put together without much thought to actual trans people. Sure, the anthology features a couple of prominent trans writers — Kaldera himself, Patrick Califia, and Raven Gildea (I don’t know what it is with the Raven thing either) — but the vast majority of the writers are non-trans, or at least they don’t say anything in their bios that would lead one to understand they are trans. This in itself is not necessarily a bad thing; I know plenty of non-trans people who have a strong understanding of trans folks. But when the overwhelming bulk of the writers in an anthology on any topic are people who don’t have significant direct experience of the topic at hand … things just start to feel funny.

In this particular case, the thing that bugs me about a lot of the stories is the way the trans-ness of the protagonist is the punch line to the story. Over and over again, I read stories where someone "normal" is seduced by, or pursues, a person they think is also "normal," and they get into an erotic situation, and — whoops! Turns out there’s a little surprise in those panties or boxers! And isn’t that hot and kinky and different and exotic! Reading repeated descriptions of tall, striking women with strong shoulders and somewhat short reedy-voiced men, not as descriptors of sexy trans people but rather as foreshadowing for the "Wow! Look at that, a trans person!" moment at the peak of the story … well, it got tiresome pretty quickly.

It reminds me of a conversation I had with a male-to-female trans friend of mine in which I groused about people who fetishize trans folks. She answered, "What’s wrong with fetishizing? Trans people are sexy!" I answered that of course trans people are sexy. Or at least, the chances of me personally finding a trans person to be sexy are at least as high as the chances of me finding a non-trans person to be sexy. But that’s not the same thing as fetishizing. If I find a trans person sexy, it’s because they’re a sexy person, not because I can’t wait to see what exotic treasures I’ll find in their pants and get all hot and bothered about how weird and unusual they are. The trans people whom I find sexy are primarily people, not vehicles for exciting hormone-altered body parts. Their gender journeys may (or may not) indicate that they’re comfortable with gender-bend, with various types of boundary-crossing and norm-challenging, in which case we’re probably pretty compatible because I’ve been doing that very thing most of my life and it’s pretty central to how I understand myself as a person and as a sexual being, even though I have not taken that to the point of formal gender transition myself. But from there to seeing trans-ness as an exciting form of freakishness that’s ripe for my ogling or consumption … no thanks. That’s just plain icky.

As a person who’s dated many trans folks over the last eight years, as well as counting many of them among my friends and acquaintances, I’m not blind to the differences of gender-altered bodies as compared to the rest of us mass-produced types. From experience and conversation, I’m privileged to have some fairly intimate knowledge about trans bodies. I know that new estrogen-inspired breasts sometimes react with more sensitivity and sometimes with less than they did pre-hormone, and are sometimes quite tender as they grow, much like my own were at puberty. I know that breast implants may cause nipples to react differently, and that you should generally not do heavy impact play on them. I know that some trans gals are quite comfortable in their bodies — one lovely tall lady I know happily refers to her gams as her "gorgeous long transsexual legs" and considers them a benefit of being trans — while others are ashamed of the parts of themselves that still appear masculine and struggle very much with their body image.

I know that pre- or non-op trans gals often have very different relationship to the organ that some people call a cock than guys do, and may call it a clit, or a girl-dick, or something else entirely; some like to use it for fucking, some like to get blow-jobs, and some (the majority, in my experience, but that’s subjective of course) really have no interest in using it for traditional purposes at all. I know that some still get hard-ons and some don’t, chicks-with-dicks porn notwithstanding. I know that post-op trans gals often have very sensitive clits and need lube in the places where non-trans gals self-lubricate. I know some post-op gals who ejaculate much in the way that some non-trans girls can squirt, and some pre- and non-op ones who don’t, thanks to estrogen. I know some post-op trans women who find penetration difficult, and others who kept dilating and dilating after surgery to the point where they can take a fist like a champ.

I know that some trans guys don’t want to get fucked in the hole that some people refer to as a cunt, and others like it a whole lot; and that some call it a cunt, and some call it a front hole or any number of other creative words, and some don’t call it much at all. I know some trans guys who lubricate way more than they did when female, and others who find that T dries them out and makes their inner skin more vulnerable to tearing. I know that some trans guys feel like their non-op chests are a barrier of flesh between them and the person they’d like to hold close, and would rather not be touched there because all it does is remind them of how their bodies don’t match their insides. I know that others are happy enough to bind, or who don’t even bother with that, and love having their nipples played with. I know that some take pride in a scarred post-op chest and others feel like they still can’t take their shirts off because it will show their difference. I know that some are hesitant to take their shirts off not because of the status of their chests, but because the hormone-induced acne has given them scars of a different kind or because stretch marks from previous pregnancy still mark them as female-bodied.

I know some trans guys who pack a softie and some who loudly, proudly sport a camel-toe. I know some trans guys who love to strap it on to fuck, and others for whom strap-ons feel too much like a marker of lesbian sex so they prefer to fuck in other ways. I know some trans guys who embrace the libido-surge of testosterone like it’s the best drug high they’ve ever had, and others who problematize the idea that T makes you horny because that implicitly devalues the strength of women’s libidos. I know some trans guys who’ll happily shuck off their clothes and jump into bed for hours of energetic romping, and others who will give the sweetest kisses and cuddles but who just aren’t comfortable enough in their bodies to have sex at all.

I know what it’s like to think someone’s beautiful even when they don’t think of themselves that way, and to see their gender as beautiful regardless of what their bodies look like. That beauty, to me, doesn’t fade as a person progresses deeper into transition or becomes more convincingly able to "pass" — passing itself being a problematic idea, as Julia Serano explains in her book Whipping Girl, in that it places the power to determine gender acceptability in the hands of non-trans onlookers rather than assigning those onlookers with the responsibility to question their own gender assumptions and be respectful in the first place. No, I don’t eroticize the in-betweenness per se, I eroticize the person, and people change over time whether they’re trans or not.

At the same time as I write all this, I recognize that we don’t always choose the features that turn us on. I know some people who often end up dating folks from a particular racial background, and it’s not because they exoticize and fetishize those people because of their perceived racially-inherent characteristics, they just often find certain physical features attractive that happen to be common to that group. I also know people who often date fat people, or short people, or people who look like their dads. I don’t begrudge anyone their tastes, and so in a way I can understand how if someone truly does find the specific feature of gender-hybrid bodies to be a turn-on, that’s not necessarily a form of exploitive objectification.

Still, there’s something about the prevalence of "hybrid is oh-so-exciting" stories in Trans Figures that really bugs me. A couple of stories where the non-trans protagonist switches pronouns as soon as the "real" sex of the trans character is "discovered" … a couple of stories where the trans character serves as a canvas upon which the non-trans character can paint all his or her own gender insecurities, or is clearly serving as the author’s own "girl for a day" fantasy material … Stir in a couple of stories where trans-ness is paired with drug-fuelled debauchery or violence or even murder, as though the presumably freakish nature of a trans person could only be understood in a context of generalized destructive frenzy, and you end up with a rather unsavoury meal that just doesn’t have the flavor of respect that I need to fully enjoy erotica about a marginalized group.

Unfortunately, even a couple of the writers from whom I’d like to expect better managed to disappoint.

M. Christian chose to republish Annie Sprinkle’s famous 1989 piece, "My First Female-to-Male Transsexual Lover," which made me cringe when I first saw it in its docu-porn form and still makes me cringe in written form today. Little gems like Annie writing, "Sometimes he dropped little hints to let me know he was still a woman deep down," or "Having sex with Les was a constant mind fuck. I could put my finger inside his pussy … his pussy? … and feel her balls." And Les saying that it makes perfect sense for him to go from lesbian separatist to trans man: "a classic case of the ‘oppressed becoming the oppressor, with forced integration as radical therapy.’" Though I’m sure Annie had the best of intentions, and in the 20 years following may have developed a more nuanced and less awestruck and pronoun-hopping understanding of FTM identity, this piece is problematic in so many layers I barely know where to start. Just for starters I gotta say that most trans men I know don’t revel in the idea of becoming an oppressor, and are more likely to be highly critical of male privilege than joyfully accepting of it, unlike Les who quite simply loves it and seems to have no critique of it at all (at least at the time — again, this was nearly two decades ago). But to see a dated and politically painful piece like Annie’s in the first few pages of a trans erotica book published in 2006 did not bode well for the rest of the collection.

Another piece that showed lots of promise — much more recent, and written by well-known and politically astute FTM writer Raven Kaldera — also disappointed me, all the more so because it surprised me in its lack of strong political critique. Raven’s piece, "Defying Normal," features some highly lucid observations about trans identity and MTF/FTM couples, of which he has lots of first-hand experience, but he says a few things that just about made me screech. Writing about MTF breasts, he says, "The breasts grow, the nipples become larger and more responsive. Playing with them often gets you a chance to see that open-mouthed, gasping, wide-eyed, entirely feminine response of surrender, complete with starfishing limbs and tossing hair." And later, about MTF libido, "MTFs all report a definite drop in libido from the high doses of estrogen used to counter their native testosterone, and then usually another drop when the source of that testosterone is surgically removed. Some drop so far that they become nearly sexless except for that awfully feminine reason for having sex: intimacy and bonding with your partner."

In both of these passages, Raven shocks me with his unquestioning ideas about femininity and female sexuality — he writes as though it were all about surrender and ditziness and wanting to have a hearts-and-flowers connection with a lover in which you don’t really want to get off. Don’t get me wrong, for some women (trans or otherwise) that’s exactly what it is. But there are plenty of us, again trans or otherwise, who have a very different experience of what it’s like to be female and to fuck or desire. First, not all trans women take estrogen or have bottom surgery, and those who do don’t universally experience it the way he describes. But beyond the physical specifics of MTF transition, it floors me that Raven would brazenly describe feminine sexuality in these terms without also leaving room for all the women for whom sex is raunchy, raw, hot and powerful, and for whom the "entirely feminine response of surrender" looks more like the entirely feminine wielding of drive or dominance, and a demanding appetite for pleasure and satisfaction. Raven is well known for his D/s relationship with his boy, Josh, also an FTM guy — so clearly he’s familiar with masculine expressions of surrender as well as masculine expressions of dominance. Why can’t he extend the same range of options to women? Talk about reinforcing the gender binary. Yeesh.

There are a few shining stories that stand out from the rest. Califia doesn’t fail to arouse body and mind with his piece "Holes," a powerful tale about his pre-trans existence as a dyke in men’s leather bars, with a fantastic scene in which he fists a deaf male bottom and experiences this as a chance to transcend gender well before he ever physically transitions. Raven Gildea contributed the wrenching piece "The Perfect One-Night Stand," about a dyke Daddy/boy scene that turns into a six-year long-distance relationship and ends as the boy goes through an abusive primary relationship and emerges as a girl instead. For all that the premise isn’t too believable, I also enjoyed Cait’s "Rebel Without a Cock," a story about two trans people who cruise one another in a bar each without realizing the other is trans; it manages to be refreshingly genuine in its portrayal of FTM/MTF sex with really likeable characters you just want to see ride off into the sunset together.

R. Gay’s piece "Small Considerations" ends on a cheesy note but provides a satisfying conclusion to a very long build-up (of several years) between a character who starts out as a dyke and transitions to male, all while sharing a mutual unrequited lust with her male best friend. Kai Bayley’s "Overboard" is weirdly hot, a tale about a rather competitive threesome between a dyke/trans guy (not sure which), his/her male best friend, and the delicious woman they pick up à deux in a bar one night. Thomas S. Roche’s story "The Waters of Al Adra" is one of the stranger pieces, and not terribly erotic, but is a very compelling story, the kind that feels like it’ll stick in the mind for a long time. And last but not least, Simon Sheppard’s "How Queer?", while too heady to feel particularly erotic to me, does a great job of showcasing the perspective of a gay man who fucks trans guys and doesn’t see this as making him any less than a Kinsey 6.

So that’s … what, seven stories out of 24 that were good and didn’t piss me off? Slightly less than one-third. I suppose the ratio isn’t too far off from what I might find in any other erotica anthology. It’s just that most of the time my reasons for disliking two-thirds of the erotica I read are located either in the realm of "that’s just not my thing" or in that of "jeebus, you can’t write," whereas here, trans people often are my thing, and most of these writers can write just fine … they just come at the topic from an angle that leaves me feeling more uncomfortable than aroused.

not to mention this cheesy cover 1560234911.jpg


Trannylicious!

Posted: July 28th, 2008 | Author: | Filed under: Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Trans | No Comments »

http://www.heklina.com/kissoff/

I wish i could go to this.

Lady Miss Kier is a hot lady, i dunno.

I need some transexual friends, look how fun and fabulous they are. I bet theyre the most fun people to hang out with ever. And they could teach me how to put on makeup! (okay i’m kidding about that part) HeklinaWithBoys.jpg


A very sad story in Newsweek

Posted: July 27th, 2008 | Author: | Filed under: Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Trans | 1 Comment »

WTF is wrong with people?

http://www.newsweek.com/id/147790


First Black Tranny on RealityTV…for P Diddy

Posted: July 25th, 2008 | Author: | Filed under: Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Trans | No Comments »

very interesting! and she’s gorgeous! this is pretty cool, though, as the hip hop community is notoriously homophobic.

http://perezhilton.com/2008-07-25-diddy-loves-trannies

go to the link for video of her on the show

Yes, Diddy is looking for another assistant – and he’s documenting the search on a new VH1 reality show beginning next week.

Well, in a somewhat groundbreaking move, one of the contestants vying to be Puff’s P.A. is a tranny.

A gorgeous tranny by the name of Laverne Cox (see above)! And, we’re not talking about a drag queen.

She’s got the boobies, though we hear she’s still got her ding ding too.

Home girl is the FIRST black tranny to be cast on a reality show!

Diddy must have known, right?????

Does Laverne have what it takes to make it as his assistant???? Will she be embraces by the fellow contestants and the hip hop community????

CLICK HERE to watch some video of Miz Cox in action on Diddy’s show! lcox__oPt.jpg


Oklahoma Politician’s Homophobic Comic Book

Posted: July 21st, 2008 | Author: | Filed under: Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Trans | No Comments »

Go to source for link to the whole comic- it’s pdf.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=5403426&page=1

Political candidates looking for an edge have employed all types of cutthroat tactics to sully their opponents, from TV ads depicting nuclear war and paroled murderer-rapists to flyers alleging interracial relationships and criminal fraud.
A politician in Oklahoma uses a 16-page comic book to lampoon his opponents.

And then there was the 16-page homophobic comic book featuring Satan, angels, toga-wearing gay people and crude depictions of public officials discussing "anal sodomy" and "Pedifiles."

Read the whole comic book here.

Brent Rinehart, an Oklahoma County Commissioner locked in a tough reelection race, spent two months creating the comic book and is preparing to send it out to registered Republicans in his district.

In one panel, Satan is depicted holding a pitchfork, saying "If I can get the kids to believe homosexuality is normal!"

A nearby angel replies, "Hey Satan, not with Brent around you won’t."

also BAHAHAHAHAHA to this picture. gay_protester.jpg


Bisexual songs, movies, and everything ever!

Posted: July 3rd, 2008 | Author: | Filed under: Gay, Lesbian, Bi-sexual, Trans | No Comments »

not everything, that is…add to the list. One of my favorite finds from this list was Herman’s Hermits "This Door Swings Both Ways." Hilarious AND catchy!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_media_portrayals_of_bisexuality

If there’s anyone else interested, we could watch and listen to some of these and fill in the notes about how bisexual persons are portrayed :) any takers?

also i really want to see the documentary, Bi the way. only when you search for it a lot of porn comes up…

argh another tough picture choice. frida? something called "relax…it’s just sex?"

no. le guin. if you havent read this…i don’t even know. part of my ‘educate {x} about awesome stuff and anarchy so he can forget that he ever thought i was cool’ series. Frida_1.jpg (31.19 K) dispossessed2.jpg